Maybe a different solution:
I can implement badi /SCWM/BADI_TO_CONFIRM_POST
here I can see what actually is confirmed. If it's the last pallet, I can manually trigger the PPF for printing.
Then the question is - how to manually trigger the PPF?
Regards
Michael
Dear All
I have dynamic binning concept , I want to use put away rule Addition to Existing Stock / Empty Bin Strategy with capacity check on weight, I have maintained weight of my Bin is 500 KG and product weight is 100 KG, when I am going to buy 5qty of my product then system is suggesting one bin for all 5 qty but when I am going to buy 6 qty of the same product then system has to suggest two bins one for 5 qty and another for 1 qty.
But system is throwing an error mentioned below :
Handling unit type E1 determined
Determine destination data - start *****
Storage type search fully defined: No entry found
Storage type search with wild card: Search sequence AG03 and rule found
Storage type search sequence AG03 found
Destination storage section check is not active in storage type AG03
HU type check is not active in storage type AG03
Capacity check against bin type T003
Capacity determined from HU 8000071110
Weight: 600 KG are checked
against free capacity 500 KG with tolerance 0 KG
Maximum weight (incl. tolerance) for HU8000071110 was exceeded by 100 KG
Alternatives during bin search: 1st alt. Stor.Bin Type, 2nd alt. Storage Sec., 3rd alt. StorType
No bin search possible. Storage types/sections/bin types incomplete
Requested amount could not be supplied
Warehouse tasks created internally for HU 8000071110 will be deleted
Please suggest me solution
SAP Pandit
Hi All
I have a requirement in my inbound process, i am using POSC + LOSC (Unloading->GR-Zone->Deconsolidation-> Bin Drop->Final Putaway), in this inbound cycle we want to use fixed HU for Totes and Trolley with Bar Code so that user will scan Tote and put the material in Tote and he will send this tote to Bin Drop Area where Binner will bin the material.
So here my query is, how to create fixed HU with fixed number range per HU, so that it will be reused again.
Thanks & Regards
SAP Pandit
what is the setting maintained against the "Capacity Check" at storage type level for the storage type which is maintained against the search
SPRO----EWM ---Master data---Define storage type
Hi Manish
I am using below settings in my storage type :
Conf Putaway Check box Ticked
Stor. Ctrl / Ptw Ctrl Check Box Ticked
Putaway Rules - 2
Capacity Check - Blank
Mixed Storage - 3
SAP Pandit
Hi,
as your log says this:
"Capacity check against bin type T003"
you must have also set the flag "early capacity check", because this is what checks against the max bin type.
Now I am not sure how much this flag influences this, as my system somehow in the moment does not do that properly. But you should try to set the value "1" for "Split During Putaway" in the storage type. Because this is what you actually want the system to do.
Brgds
Juergen
Message was edited by: Juergen Pitz
Hi Jurgen
Thanks for your reply..
I have done the same configuration as mentioned above and found system behavior as mentioned below :
1. System is dividing into two task (one is for 2 Qty and another is for 4 Qty), but as per the weight it has to divide into 5 Qty and 1 Qty.
2. After Deconsolidation, system has to go to internal storage type Bin Drop Area (Layout Oriented), it is not going, earlier it was going to internal storage type.
Sap Pandit
Hi,
you describe that you have a deconsolidation step and LOSC; that means you have an HU. Somewhere the weight of the HU should be considered as well, shouldn't it?
But why LOSC does not work in your case, I don't know. There you need to show more of this.
Brgds
Juergen
Also got this...problem is, when I add the trigger manually ( cl_manager_ppf-> create_trigger) the scheduling condition is not executed (okay, no problem), and when I check my manual ppf in SPPFP, the application key is empty:
Hi Raj
Its ecc issue of mapping loading point plant and shipping point.
check other customization around plant and and shipping point mapping. some thing is missing.
its all organization data mapping issue.
Regards
Suraj
Dear Suraj
Thanks for your Reply...
I will definitely put my comments in all posts and i will like useful posts also.
I have maintained Storage Type Data as attached screen shot, my requirement is addition to existing stock/empty bin and i am not using this for pallet / bulk, this for small medium & large parts
So can you please let me know is this right or something wrong.
Secondly, in which tab i can create PICK HU in Deconsolidation Table.
Thanks for your extraordinary support..
Very helpful answers .
Sap Pandit
Hello All
I am getting following error, While confirming IB03 Task
Kindly Give me solution for Same
Regards
Akash
Hi Akash,
While confirming the WH task in form view there is a check for HU complete. Please try by clicking on that check and see if the task gets confirmed.
Regards,
Namita
Hi ,
Thanks for the Reply .
We have sent the request to apply to note , waiting for reply from basis team .
There is again an issue during Outbound processing of Reverse Kitting Process .
Assignment of internal <->external business partner ( Vendor / logical system of ECC ) is not possible .
Not sure checked the BP number , everything looks good .
Due to this " Delivery output could not be sent to ERP system" .
I have checked the mapping of Vendor and the logical system but it is not helping .
Any suggestion
-Thanks
Tapan
hI Namita
Thanks for your reply
It is not working. sytem is not allow me to change.
Regards
Akash
Suraj,
shipping pt and other few config is wrong and i reconfigured all its working
Many thanks
Regards
Raj
PL check .. The ID type of the business partner, if it is changed or correctly mapped.
Please reward the post & previous if it is useful.
Hello Lalit,
Sorry for the late reply, busy lately.
After finishing LT2 process, use this code in flow:
/scwm/cl_rf_bll_srvc=>set_fcode( /scwm/cl_rf_bll_srvc=>c_fcode_compl_ltrans ).
This will close transaction, hopefully LT2 not LT1.
If this does not help, i suggest using parent transactions. See my attached pic(prepared by perfect paint skillz 
).
Best regards
Serhan
Hello all,
I have a column of data containing a bunch of storage bin numbers. I need a report from which I can get data about the activity area, last 4-8 transactions in a bin, any inventory related data, etc. Basically, more the data, the better.
I tried getting this information through /SCWM/LS03, but I have to key in one storage bin at a time to get this information. Is there a report where I can input multiple storage locations and get the same or more data?
Thanks and regards.
Mohan
Hi Juergen,
I have a similar issue where a DC site was originally operating as 1 DC site with IDW WM. When it cut-over to EWM, the site was split into two to cater for the different operational processes for the different stock types (Grocery DC vs Perishable DC). Some of the articles that were maintained against the old site in MARC were batch managed but when extended to the new site, it is no longer batch managed. When the CIF sends down articles for the new site (with article and batch ticked) it sets the article in EWM as Batch Managed because it is reading MARC without the article filter selection and finds the batch indicator set on the old site. We cannot remove the Batch Indicator on the article (of old article/site combination) because Batches already exist in MSC3N.
What's the best and fastest way to overcome this issue:
- Archive the Batches (but this means archiving all subsequent objects too).
- Change the CIF program to read Batches with the article selection criteria too (Site & Status).
Regards,
Fawaaz Jacobs