Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP Extended Warehouse Management (SAP EWM)
Viewing all 5578 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Re: LOSC with partial picking from the bin

July 9, 2015, 12:45 am
$
0
0

Hi Malay,

 

LOSC can only be triggered for task with Handling units.

 

Try creating a Pick HU for the partial qty that you have picked and perform the transaction in RF.

Because in RF all task confirmations are done in 2 steps

i) Source to resource and

ii) Resource to destination. Since the resource to destination has HU (pick HU) it may trigger the LOSC.

 

I had a similar requirement where the source HU is not proposed for that storage type but i had to trigger a LOSC after picking . Whenever we  executed the transactions through desktop it wont trigger the LOSC. But when the same task was performed in RF it showed a different behavior as explained above.

 

 

 

Regards,

Venky

↧
Search

Re: Create EGR for open PO in EWM by /SCWM/ERP_DLV_DELETE

July 9, 2015, 12:50 am
$
0
0

Hi,

are you sure that there really is no EGR created? Because for me the log also never show something. Just that documents got deleted, but never if anything has been created - which is simply that the log does not contain this information.

Brgds

Juergen

↧
↧

Recurring appointment in Dock Appointment Scheduling

July 9, 2015, 11:02 pm
$
0
0


Hi All,

 

We are implementing Dock appointment scheduling and there is a requirement to have the recurring appointment in Dock appointment scheduling.

Please suggest how to do the recurring appointment with the same time slots and other details like carrier, means of transport, loading point etc..

For example if we have created the appointment for today for time slot 7AM to 8 AM for specific carrier then system will automatically create the next appointment for tomorrow with same details.

 

 

Thanks and regards

TD

↧

Re: Automatic WT confirmation

July 9, 2015, 11:55 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

the flag "confirm immediately" means that when you create the WT, you can immediately set the flag for confirmation in the moment when you create the WT (the example on the screenshot is for the manual creation without any reference).

 

10-07-2015 08-52-02.png

If the flag is not set in the WPT, then you can also not set the flag during the WT creation.

 

The flag "Propose confirmation" by itself does not do anything at all. Only in combination with the other flag, it immediately confirms the WT after the creation.

That is the same behavior as in WM...

Brgds

Juergen

↧

Re: Mulitple Batch with same shelf life/same material in bulk storage

July 10, 2015, 12:49 am
$
0
0

Hello RG K,

 

you could define a removal rule based on Stock ID for example and make it descending. In that case system should do something similar to LIFO. Stock ID is concatenate of warehouse number and warehouse task number. But I am not sure if this will help you.

It is more typical as Suraj suggests. For bulk bins you should have product WT and pick whatever HU comes first.

 

Regards,

Petr

↧
↧

Re: Mulitple Batch with same shelf life/same material in bulk storage

July 10, 2015, 1:07 am
$
0
0

Hi,

"Is there any solution to know the position or sequence of each pallet in the bulk bin which can be used to determine which pallet is the right one to pick?"

No. Because that is not what the bulk strategy is meant for. The system has no knowledge about the physical position of one pallet in the bulk.

 

"As it is a 6 deep, 2 wide, 4 hight bin, sometime we will have a issue for forklift driver to move out the pallets on the front to get the one on the end, it is a waste and lack of efficiency"

Yes, it is. Because in the bulk strategy it does not make sense to have to forklift driver pick a specific bin. Again, this it not what it is build for.

 

You should keep in a bulk bin only one material / batch, and keep this kind of material with different batches you have there in separate bins.

Brgds

Juergen

↧

Re: Mulitple Batch with same shelf life/same material in bulk storage

July 10, 2015, 1:08 am
$
0
0

Hi RG,

 

As you having multiple batches of same product with same manufacturing dates then why the operator need to pick one HU which is behind other front HU's. He should be free to pick up the front HU's first and then he can pick other HU's as n when required. It should not cause any issues or harms for picking.

 

I am not clear exactly what is your requirement, if possible can you elaborate more about your requirement.

 

Regards

Anoop

↧

Re: Recurring appointment in Dock Appointment Scheduling

July 10, 2015, 1:14 am
↧
Search

Re: ERROR IN SMQ2 OF ECC SYSTEM " FUNCTION MODULE NOT FOUND" REG....

July 10, 2015, 1:20 am
$
0
0

HI Vijay,

 

Have you created Distribution Model for your ERP WM warehouse which is linked to EWM warehouse in integrations settings in ECC:

 

ERP-SPRO-Integration with Other SAP.Com Components-EWM-Basic Settings for EWM Linkage-Generate Distribution Model from ERP to EWM

 

Regards
Anoop

 


↧
↧

Re: Looking for a method to book a goods receipt

July 10, 2015, 1:24 am
↧

Re: Create EGR for open PO in EWM by /SCWM/ERP_DLV_DELETE

July 10, 2015, 1:28 am
$
0
0

Hi RG

If you choose button DELETE and CREATE then as per standard system behaviour it should deleted the existing EGR's and should create new EGR as per entered criteria. Have you checked in /SCWM/GRN tcode?

 

Regards
Anoop

↧

Re: What is the meaning and use of QScore while defining Decision Codes in Quality Management?

July 10, 2015, 1:52 am
$
0
0

Hi Anirudh,

 

QScores can be used for Vendors Rating.

 

Thanks and regards

Anoop

↧

Re: Unable to create Outbound delivery through VL10H

July 10, 2015, 5:46 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

The purpose is to generate the outbound delivery which will be interface to EWM system. GI will be done in EWM system and this GI will be interfaced to ECC for background posting of GI for that reservation. This material has enough stock, so does not require any PO. A reservation is created for this material and for which outbound delivery will be created.

 

I hope this clarifies now.

 

Thanks

SBS

↧
↧

Re: Unable to create Outbound delivery through VL10H

July 10, 2015, 5:58 am
↧

Re: Unable to create Outbound delivery through VL10H

July 10, 2015, 6:02 am
$
0
0

Outbound delivery get generated when you executing MIGO, system does not post material document but create outbound delivery which goes to EWM. Materail document get posted when PGI is posted in EWM. Perform MIGO with reference to your reservation to trigger OB for EWM

↧
Search

OMT3R transaction in material master settings

July 10, 2015, 6:25 am
$
0
0

Hello All

 

I am using OMT3R transaction to update the screen sequencing related to WM packaging& WM execution views after activating /SPE/MATERIAL_SCREENS BC sets.

 

OMT3R transaction which is used to sequence the views of material master - I found that this activity is not transport relevant; That means, do we have to do this independently in each client?


Please correct me if I am wrong.

 

Thanks

Ravi

↧

Cannot Clear U-Zone

July 10, 2015, 8:33 am
$
0
0

Hello all - We have an issue and hope you can help.  Someone (somehow) did not properly clear out a post change notice (t-code LU04) and instead use t-code LT01 movement type 999 to manually create transfer orders.  Now, we have a negative / positive quantities in interim storage type 922 u-zone.  We tried to clear the differences via LI21 but that did not work, we actually ticked off our accounting group posting a $500,000 inventory adjustment.  We were able to reverse the posting but we still have the issue.  We cannot transfer the positive quantity to the negative quantity... it only exacerbates the issue by increasing the negative quantity and positive quantity.  Does anyone have any suggestions on how we can clear up this issue? 

↧
↧

Re: Cannot Clear U-Zone

July 10, 2015, 9:03 am
$
0
0

Not a lot to go on here but maybe the best bet is to just reverse the original movement that created the posting change and then decide what to do.


Seems to me that it wouldn't be the simplest route at this point to start over.

 

Just FYI a posting change is not the same as a transfer order so not sure that exexcuting an LT01 had any effect except to move the material from one bin to another. The positive value of a material cant be moved to reduce the negative value because they are more then likely different stock types. The posting change must be processed unless you reverse it as I mentioned. Have no idea why a LI21 was attempted that doesn't make any sense so maybe training is needed.......

 

 

Later......

↧

Re: Error que's in SMQ2

July 10, 2015, 9:43 am
$
0
0

If I understand correctly, you have created an inbound delivery in ECC system and it is not showing up in EWM system.  First check SMQ1 in ECC.  If you don't see the delivery, then check SMQ2 in EWM.  If you drill into the queue and then double click on the StatusText column, you will get log details.  You can drill into the queue by using the Display Section option, and then on new screen use Display option again.  Or you can double click the queue name and then on the new screen double click the entry with the error.  .

↧

Re: Cannot Clear U-Zone

July 10, 2015, 10:02 am
$
0
0

Unfortunately, it is not possible to start over as you suggested... too many people tried to resolve the issue on their own before reporting it to IT.

 

We are looking for a way to resolve the current issue...  The post change notice was processed but like I said, someone (somehow) the user moved stock around via t-code LT01.  I assume they felt this would fix the issue but like I said in my previous post, this only made the problem worse. 

 

LI21 was posted in at attempt to clear out the differences that were created, right or wrong, it helped with the stock quantities, but posted a high value inventory adjustment.

 

I agree that future training is needed but I am not sure how this would be a solution for our current problem.  

 

If anyone else has a suggestion on how we can resolve the current issue (see attachment) we would greatly appreciate it.

↧
Viewing all 5578 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>