Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP Extended Warehouse Management (SAP EWM)
Viewing all 5578 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Error while maintaining Activity area per storage Type

$
0
0

Hi Rama,

 

Sorry its generating .

 

 

Regards,

 

Pardeep Malik


Re: Update LOBM_VFDAT in AUSP..

$
0
0

Thanks Jurgen for reply..

 

Date value has to be stored in AUSP (characteristics Value for LOBM_VFDAT) SLED, it should have to be available in AUSP when it will distribute to EWM system. with respect to CUOBJ_CH value of LIPS.

 

Yes it is custom coding logic,Correct LOBM_VFDAT Value is displaying in selection criteria as per logic .. But problem which i am facing is characteristics Value for LOBM_VFDAT is not storing in AUSP

 

But manually if i have given any value for selection criteria from create or change(VL01N->Batch split->New Batch->Selection criteria). all the selection criteria values are available in AUSP including LOBM_VFDAT

 

Did you come across any BADI or Enhancements. For selection Criteria in (VL01N->Batch split->New Batch->Selection criteria).

Re: Error while picking for outbound delivery

$
0
0

Hi Jinoy,

Please check your process type which is determined in your WT, then go and check that WT configuration and the storage bin maintained there. Check that bin if same has been created or not in /SCWM/LS02 or LS03.

 

Regards

Anoop 

Re: Update LOBM_VFDAT in AUSP..

$
0
0

How are you updating it?  LOBM_VFDAT should never be updated directly.  It should only be updated as part of the batch record, (i.e. via MSC2n).  LOBM_VFDAT is linked to the batch field of either MCH1-VFDAT or MCHA-VFDAT (based on batch level).  When you update the field, SAP automatically updates the AUSP table under internal characteristic number 9999999400.

 

It sounds like you have implemented a user exit for somehow modifying the LOBM_VFDAT value in your selection procedure.  Why?   Put the correct value into the MCHA/MCH1 field via MSC2n or user exit and the AUSP value should simply follow along.

 

Craig

Re: Update LOBM_VFDAT in AUSP..

$
0
0

Hi Craig,

 

Thanks for reply

 

Ya I have used a Custom FM same as standard FM LOBM_UBD to modify LOBM_VFDAT in selection procedure But some how is it any way that i can pass that value of LOBM_VFDAT to AUSP.

 

to Updated AUSP I tried to used BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE but its not working properly.

 

Thanks,

Ahmed.

Re: Update LOBM_VFDAT in AUSP..

$
0
0

Back to Jurgen's question then.  Why?  If you put it into AUSP it means it becomes a value of the batch record.  When it shouldn't be.

 

Are you trying to save the selection value calculated as a stored characteristic value against the sales order?

 

Craig

Re: system is not proposing to the quantity classification storage type in putaway

$
0
0

Hi Sastry

 

 

 

I hope we are near to resolve issue.check below sap note to resolve this issue. 

 

 

1864501 - Creating warehouse tasks: Qty classification not working      

 

This problem is caused by a program error.

 

In Customizing, you stored the quantity classification for the units of measure. (Customizing path: EWM => Master Data => Product => Define Unit of Measure Attributes)

 

The stock is kept in the base unit of measure only. No stock is kept in an alternative unit of measure for the product.

 

No packaging specification is stored for the product.

 

 

This is the issue, packspec was not picking whiling creating WT  and not checking QC for WT.

 

Check

 

1. Also at the same time maintain 0WHT condition in pack spec.

2. storage type with QC indicator at general and putaway level.

3. search sequence with qc and wpt.

 

with this note concept of operative  UOM  will be over written by base unit of measure.

 

 

Regards

Suraj

Re: system is not proposing to the quantity classification storage type in putaway

$
0
0


Hi,

 

Thnak you for the update. I saw the OSS note and it seems correction is valid for component SCMEWM From Rel. 900.  seems cannot be used for SAP SCM 7.0

 

status is showing as Cannot be implemented.

 

Regards

Sastry


Error Meaage-Delivery item : Goods Movement bin not populated

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

When I make the transaction mov 561 in ERP system,and than I wan to GR this document in EWM system.

 

The error message show that

 

Delivery XXXXXX  item10 : Goods Movement bin not populated

 

How do I solve this problem?

 

Thank You

 

Best Regards,

Howard

Cross docking in EWM with material number

$
0
0

Hi,

 

There is a requirement to cross dock (Box in and Box out). Please inform whether it is feasible to cross dock the Handling units in EWM without creating the material numbers in HU in ECC / EWM system.

 

Regards,

 

Mrinal

Re: Cross docking in EWM with material number

$
0
0

??? How do you want to cross-dock if you don't know what is in the box?

Brgds

Juergen

S159 table update issue VL35 (wave picks)

$
0
0

Hi all

I have an issue.

I am trying to configure wave pick according to time slots and capacity restrictions


I have done the following configs

  • Number Ranges for Wave Picks
  • Define Group Types for Wave Picks
  • Define Number Range for Group
  • Calculate Workload
  • Control Update of Workload Data (below screenshot as it is, could not figure out this one)
  • Maintain Time of Comparison for Forming Wave Picks
  • Maintain Wave Picks Profile
  • Maintain Time Slots
  • Maintain Time-slot Group for Wave Pick


After this I create a delivery for picking through VL04 for a stock transport order

And then I execute VL35. I get below warning message. I am stuck here.

Searching a lot of places i found that S159 update might be one of the issues.

I checked and indeed S159 is not updated. I checked in MC26, table update is active.


OUR REQUIREMENT:

What we want is to create a wave containing multiple deliveries with similar goods issue time.

Pick the wave in 2 steps, i.e. pick from racks and then distribute to different trucks. Replenishment functionality is also required.


Also I went through SAP documentation but I am still not clear when to execute VL35 and in fact the entire functionality

What will be the steps

Create delivery >> Create Group >>Create TO from group >> Create Wave from group>> Process wave>> PGI?? Am very confused.

Or is wave created after PGI.

Appreciate any help.

sap.png

sap.png

Re: Cross docking in EWM with material number

$
0
0

Hi Juergen,

 

Thanks for your reply .

I will explain the business requirement in a more detailed way .

There are instances that client's customer advises their vendor to ship the materials to client's plant . Client can receive those materials at any time .Those materials will not be unpacked or there will be no value addition to it . They will be just Box in and Box out in the form of HU . Client does not know the content of Box (HU) being received , they just want to receive it and store or stage it in some place and move it out the after some time.

 

Can we achieve this in SAP or EWM or any other alternative way of meeting this requirement. I looked into the possibility of transportation cross docking , but it appears that GR is needed in that case . We do not want to do any GR of material (as in that case material numbers need to be created in system) . Intend to store just in the form of HU only without any material information.

 

Thanks in advance .

 

Regards,

 

Mrinal

Re: Post difference after WT confirmed

$
0
0

Thank you very much for the help.

Pick Pack Pass with POSC

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

We will be implementing Pick Pack Pass due to conveyor setting in the warehouse. And after all sub-WOs are completed, we would like the pick-HU pass through a staging point(bin 0020-04-04-B in below picture). But after the pick-HU enters the bin, the subsequent WT to GI-zone is not created automatically. I have try a few external steps for this purpose but none of them works. Please kindly share some thoughts.

 

Capture.PNGCapture2.PNG

 

Best and Thanks,

Eddie


Re: Pick Pack Pass with POSC

$
0
0

Hi,

the first picture shows no bin for the step OB04, so "rulebased" is flagged? And did you set up the staging area / door determination?

And what is the internal process step assigned to OB03 and OB04? In the standard OB03 should be STAG (so this is already for the staging area or what you call GI-Zone, OB04 should be LOAD (or something like that).

In one test I did I actually used layout oriented storage control.

Brgds

Juergen

Re: Cross docking in EWM with material number

$
0
0

Hi Mrinal,

Client does not requires to know what is inside the box .

can you tell how you do charge the customer, means how do you price your sales order for cross docking ? is it based on Weight, Cubic, Route???

 

In this scenario, TCD can be mapped in EWM. you need to create a few generic materials (freight) - non valuated . Not required to create materials for exact product inside the box. In transport cross Docking process , you need to go GR  and GI in each cross dock location till we deliver to final customer.  Generic SKU s can be packed before GR so you can track customers stock in HU level also  in EWM.

 

Saby

Re: 2 different PPF actions triggering two different smartforms

$
0
0

Hi ,

 

I have used this functionality in EWM.

If you need to trigger multiple forms via same PPF then,

1) create new condition table (if required)

2) create a new access sequence with new table

3) Create a new Condition types

4) Assign multiple condition types to  same Procedure

 

 

thanks

Saby

Re: Pick Pack Pass with POSC

$
0
0

Hello Juergen,

 

Thanks for the response. You mentioned you use LOSC, do you know is it possible to connect pick pack pass directly with LOSC? From my current testing, after finishing the first sub-WO, pick-HU then "branch out" due to LOSC. While what i want is all the sub-WOs to be completed first then connect to LOSC.

 

Best and Thanks,

Eddie

Re: Cross docking in EWM with material number

$
0
0

Hi Saby,

 

Thanks .. All these activities will be carried out in non valuated plant . Client has a strange agreement with the customer for this kind of service (which is not related with volume , weight etc) .Intention is only to create logistic part of HU handling through EWM.

 

Will merchandise cross docking be more appropriate . I found a note number 859252 SAP press ewm book but market place that it is not released.It will be good if anyone has a copy of it.

 

With regards,

 

Mrinal

Viewing all 5578 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>