If it is during picking that means the original removal strategy must be preserved, correct? Then you can specifiy an exception code, which picker will use in case the HU must be opened.
You will find list in Cross-process Settings - Exception handling. Then you need to test which one will fit your requirement. You may consider BIDF, DIFH, SKFD or SKFE, or you can copy and adjust the settings if necessary.
Brgds,
Petr
Hi Faical,
Yes, we are using direct outbound deliveries. They are created in EWM (used for unplanned goods issues)
If the goods go to a customer then a billable delivery is automatically created in ERP.
If the goods go to a plant, then an STO & delivery are automatically created in ERP.
Regards
Guy
Hi Experts,
As soon as the production is completed, finished products will be moved from production area to storage area in warehouse and stock will be there for
few days as part of the process. Then, warehouse user should be intimated with alert to make the picking of products and putaway in another storage
area, where it is available for sale. How can i achieve this, please help me.
Thanks....
Srini
Hi Suraj ,
Thank you for your reply.
You are suggesting me to make condition (to trigger an eamil to WH user) in PPF (/SCDL/MSG_PRD_IN_GR_SEND) which triggers at the time of first putaway (from production area to storage area) to send GR message back to ECC. Can you detail please.
Hi Gurus,
As part of everyday deliveries to customers, we load trucks at certain point of time in the morning.
Our requirement is, we receive multiple customer orders in same route to deliver. So, here I am doing wave picking for all those deliveries to pick, but need to control at the time of loading. For ex: I have 10 customer locations to deliver in same route, i need to load 10th customer first in truck , until it finishes system should not allow me to load remaining customer ordered goods. That way we can deliver without any issues when we reach customer location.
How can we achieve this in EWM , please suggest me. Thank you in advance.
Thank you....
Srini
Hi Eugene,
In tcode /SCWM/TU itself you can see these details as per attached screen shot by Steven J.
Thanks and regards
Anoop Singh
Hi Srini,
Please find below details for basic understading and possibilities on this
Loading Sequence - Shipping and Receiving - SAP Library
Thanks and regards
Anoop Singh
Hi Anandakiran,
I think you should first delete the HU assignment from the existing TU only then it will allow you to assign/pack in new TU.
Thanks and regards
Anoop Singh
Hi Karthik,
Once confirmed, can not be canceled. You can revert the movements by creating adhoc tasks either for Product or for HU as mentioned by R Sastry.
Thanks and regards
Anoop Singh
Yes thanks guys. I was over-complicating it. Reason I seldom use this screen is because I sometimes can't find historical TUs that have been Goods Issued. That is another issue though. For now this works fine.
Hi ,
Thanks for the response.
Exception codes BIDF ,DIFH , SKFD or SKFE is not having Skip Validation Field ( SKFD- Skip Current Validation Field ) .
Do I need to use this internal process . (Current Validation Field )
Does this internal process skip the FIFO logic .
I have another exception which we need during picking for replinishment task .
During Picking their the systems is showing the stock but physically the material is not present .
Which exception code do we need to use for this scenario .
If the operator finds the material is physically not present and would like to enter the exception code and look for alternate bin for picking . Which exception code do we need to use .
Hi,
If I understand your requirement correctly you can resolve the proces sending the unpacked pallet into PI area using DIFW exception code. But perhaps you will need to create a new picking task at once.
In theory, you can try to copy BIDF into a new one and modify the configuration so it sends the difference into PI area. This exception code should create a new picking task with the same SRCI rules. While having the actual pallet in the PI area, another one should come up.
From PI area back to pickface should be a manual PI proces.
Petr
Hi,
We've created a posting change in ERP to indicator the movement in one warehouse.
But when there is one item in the PC(ERP, type DTR) and in EWM the item split to two bins, after WTs are all confirmed, the error message 'Document ******** cannot be distributed into ERP system.' occured.
I know now it's the message that EWM want ERP to split the DTR doucment to two documents.
I don't want the system to split the DTR and only want the whole posting.(can generate two or more material document in ERP as ID did).
Is there anyone who can give some solution to fulfill my requirement above?
Thank you.
Greetings Azam,
Kindly check the below mentioned points:
1) Check if the PO is released !
2) PO does not have a plant / storage location combination ! (with Jeurgen)
Sorry ,I made a mistake.
When there is only one item in DTR, whether it is splited in WO, there is no error message.
But when there is more then one item(e.g. two items), and one of them is splited to two lines because of different bins, error occures when we confirmed the WO.
Is there any idea to solve the problem without split DTR?
Hi,
Please read the basic description of the process.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_ewm70/helpdata/en/d0/742db819ae464db441f80ab6963e4f/content.htm
You may configure a return document to standard IDPD, which can be created in EWM and which can trigger reverse material document for production GR in ERP.
There is no standard way how to cancel production order from EWM.
Petr
Hi Gurus,
i am new to this group. we have completed successfull implementation of EWM and moving to prod by this month. i would like to know your experiences from support perspective. can anyone please share the typical P1/P2 issues you faced and the solutions for those.
your help would be appreciated much.
Thanks,
venu
Some major issues.
Technical support for SMQ2 for both EWM and ECC.
Delivery splits in ECC for rare cases.
Additional GRs from EWM for ECC deliveries, which are completed.
Missing authorizations at go-live is a problem across all implementations. Here in some cases SU53 does not give proper results, since there might be RFC communication in place.
Guys ... I've just configured storage type as FIFO... please suggest me how to test the same in the SAP... How to find out that the storage bin got selected in the FIFO manner.. I'm new to SAP - WM .... please help....
regards,
Ganesh